>>25512I'm bored so I'm gonna rate them by how realistic they are as people, please discuss:
0-4: completely unrealistic due to "is loaded, will take care of you", those types are financial parasites more than any other, even looking past that there's only a couple women who will larp as this type for money, 0%
5-9: surprisingly realistic, there are still plenty of these women, some of the terminally online variety, it's definitely a type, 2%
10-14: idk about the insults part, but yeah sportsy women are real and cool, 5%
15-19: idk about the asexual part but this is moreorless a rare person that exists, 2%
20-24: I mean yeah that exists, the onlyfans part is definitely less likely than the others, 5%
25-29: career part is a bit specific but this woman exist otherwise, 3%
30-34: that's a few women that are just prominent, <0.5%
35-39: this is actually the same person as 25-29, in fact this is how 25-29 sees herself when she age regresses, and she's already doing meth, still 3%
40-44: this is pretty much any woman, 90%
50-54: I mean sure whatever, I don't think you could assimilate at all lmao this wouldn't work
55-59: another extension of 25-29 and 35-39, literally the same person, still 3%
65-68: I do not know of any women like this but surely depends on the location, very location dependent, ?%
70-74: doesn't shave is a reach, but sure, 2%
75-79: some fantasy again
85-89: definitely still a thing but going extinct, also mutt's law, idk what bbd is, 2%
90-94: this is believable, 3%
